CO129-320 - Governor Sir Blake Acting Governor May - 1903 [11-12] — Page 542

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

no hesitation in saying that the claimant "ought to be allowed a full opportunity of setting youth the grounds on which his alleged right "rest, and also of knowing and answering "any of acts and reasons which may be put "forward in opposition to it.

With regard to the legality of the Award, "Mr. C. A. Cripps K. C. M.P. and Mr. Morton W Smith, our Counsel in the case, state; -

"That the Acting Governor in deciding on the "Claim of your Petitioners under the said "Ordinance was acting in a judicial capacity "and was bound to decide on proper and legal grounds and not in an arbitrary manner and without hearing the case of your Petitioners, "or allowing them to know of, and to answer, "the case made against them on behalf of the "Government of the said Colony; and therefore "on the admitted facts the Chief Justice should "have set aside the Award."

Page 1

1857.

10. This moral right was recognized by Her Majesty's Government as far back as in the case of the Bowring Praya Reclamation; where, in instructions to the Colonial Government, it is said: "While, therefore, the rights "of the Crown and the interests of the public "require that the claim of the Crown to such "lands should be firmly maintained, a sense of justice requires that the equitable claim of the holders of the Original Marine Lots should be liberally considered. See Government Gazette 7th March 1857.

11. Possibly it is not known to His Majesty's present advisers that strenuous objections "were made by ourselves, other Marine Lot holders, and the Local Press, to the Governor conferring upon himself by Ordinance an absolute discretion to give something or nothing to the Crown Lessee of a Marine Lot whose legal rights granted by Her late Majesty Queen Victoria had been taken away for a public purpose.

12. It is but right, however, to Governor des Voeux, to state that in his Message to the Legislative Council on the 20th March 1889, before the passing of the Reclamation Ordinance, he referred to the objections that had been made in the following words; "It is needless to say that the Government has no desire to "accord other than the fullest justice in respect "of private rights; and though the provision in "question has no doubt an arbitrary appearance, "that aspect of it will probably disappear altogether from unprejudiced minds when fully considered." And at the meeting of the Legislative Council on the 29th March 1889 when two of the Members, Mr. Ryrie and W. Layton, spoke on behalf of ourselves and other Marine Lot holders whose property would be affected, the form the circumstances are

Page 536

Edit History

2026-06-01 12:07:27 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
no hesitation in saying that the claimant "ought to be allowed a full opportunity of setting youth the grounds on which his alleged right "rest, and also of knowing and answering "any of acts and reasons which may be put "forward in opposition to it.With regard to the legality of the Award, "Mr. C. A. Cripps K. C. M.P. and Mr. Morton W Smith, our Counsel in the case, state; -"That the Acting Governor in deciding on the "Claim of your Petitioners under the said "Ordinance was acting in a judicial capacity "and was bound to decide on proper and legal grounds and not in an arbitrary manner and without hearing the case of your Petitioners, "or allowing them to know of, and to answer, "the case made against them on behalf of the "Government of the said Colony; and therefore "on the admitted facts the Chief Justice should "have set aside the Award."Page 11857.10. This moral right was recognized by Her Majesty's Government as far back as in the case of the Bowring Praya Reclamation; where, in instructions to the Colonial Government, it is said: "While, therefore, the rights "of the Crown and the interests of the public "require that the claim of the Crown to such "lands should be firmly maintained, a sense of justice requires that the equitable claim of the holders of the Original Marine Lots should be liberally considered. See Government Gazette 7th March 1857.11. Possibly it is not known to His Majesty's present advisers that strenuous objections "were made by ourselves, other Marine Lot holders, and the Local Press, to the Governor conferring upon himself by Ordinance an absolute discretion to give something or nothing to the Crown Lessee of a Marine Lot whose legal rights granted by Her late Majesty Queen Victoria had been taken away for a public purpose.12. It is but right, however, to Governor des Voeux, to state that in his Message to the Legislative Council on the 20th March 1889, before the passing of the Reclamation Ordinance, he referred to the objections that had been made in the following words; "It is needless to say that the Government has no desire to "accord other than the fullest justice in respect "of private rights; and though the provision in "question has no doubt an arbitrary appearance, "that aspect of it will probably disappear altogether from unprejudiced minds when fully considered." And at the meeting of the Legislative Council on the 29th March 1889 when two of the Members, Mr. Ryrie and W. Layton, spoke on behalf of ourselves and other Marine Lot holders whose property would be affected, the form the circumstances arePage 536
Baseline (Original)
no hesitation in saying that the claimant "ought to be allowed a full opportunity of setting youth the grounds on which his alleged right "rest, and also of knouring and answring "any of acts and reasons which may be put "forward invopposition to it.With regard to the legality of the Award, "Mr. C. A. Cripps K. C. M.P. and Mr. Morton W Smith, our Counsel in the case, state; -manur"That the Acking Governor in deciding on the "Clown of your Petitiouers under the said "Ordinance was actingiacting in a judicial capacity " and was bound to decide on proper and legal arbitrary groreds and not in air and without hearing the case of your Petitiones, "or allowing them to know of, and to answer, "the case made aganist them on behalf of the "Government of the said Colony; and therefore "on the admitted facts the Chief Justice should " have set aside the Award." 1"1857.10. This moral right was recognized by Her + Majesty's Government as far back as in the case of the Bowring Praya Reclamation; where, in instructions to the Colonical levern- -ment, it is said: "While, therefore, the rights " of the brown and the interests of the public " require that the claim of the Crown to such "lands should be firmly maintained, a sense of justice requires that the equitable claim of the holders of the Origival Marine hots536 should be lebrially considered. See Government Gazette 7th March 1857.11. Jossibly it is not known to His Majestift -present advisers that strmous objections "were made by ourselves, other Han Maring Lot holders, and the Local Press, to the Governor conferring upon himself by Redinance an absolute discretion to give something de nothing to the brown Lessee of a Marine Lot whose legal rights granted by Her late Majesty Queen Victoria had been taken away for a public purpose_12. It is but right, however to Governor des Voux, to state that in his Message to the Legislative Council on the 2018 March 1889, before the passing of the Reclamation Orduan he referred to the objections that had bern made in the following words; " It is needless to say that the Government has no desire to " accoed other than the fullest justice in respect "of private rights; and though the provision in "question has no doubt av arbitrary appearautą "that aspect of it will probably disappear altogether from unprejudiced minds when fully considered. And at the meeting of the Legislative loueit on the 29th March 1889 when two of the Members Mr. Ryrie and W. Layton spoke on behalf of ourselves and other Marine for holders whose property would be affected, the form the circumstances are
2026-06-01 12:07:27 · Baseline
View content

no

hesitation in saying that the claimant "ought to be allowed a full opportunity of setting youth the grounds on which his alleged right "rest, and also of knouring and answring "any of acts and reasons which may be put "forward invopposition to it.

With regard to the legality of the Award, "Mr. C. A. Cripps K. C. M.P. and Mr. Morton W Smith, our Counsel in the case, state; -

manur

"That the Acking Governor in deciding

on the "Clown of your Petitiouers under the said "Ordinance was acting i

acting in a judicial capacity " and was bound to decide on proper and legal

arbitrary groreds and not in air and without hearing the case of your Petitiones, "or allowing them to know of, and to answer, "the case made aganist them on behalf of the "Government of the said Colony; and therefore "on the admitted facts the Chief Justice should " have set aside the Award."

1

"

1857.

10. This moral right was recognized by Her + Majesty's Government as far back as

in the case

of the Bowring Praya Reclamation; where, in instructions to the Colonical levern- -ment, it is said: "While, therefore, the rights " of the brown and the interests of the public " require that the claim of the Crown to such "lands should be firmly maintained, a sense of justice requires that the equitable claim of the holders of the Origival Marine hots

536

should be lebrially considered. See Government Gazette 7th March 1857.

11. Jossibly it is not known to His Majestift -present advisers that strmous objections "were made by ourselves, other Han Maring Lot holders, and the Local Press, to the Governor conferring upon himself by Redinance an absolute discretion to give something de nothing to the brown Lessee of a Marine Lot whose legal rights granted by Her late Majesty Queen Victoria had been taken away for a public purpose_

12. It is but right, however to Governor des Voux, to state that in his Message to the Legislative Council on the 2018 March 1889, before the passing of the Reclamation Orduan he referred to the objections that had bern made in the following words; " It is needless to say that the Government has no desire to " accoed other than the fullest justice in respect "of private rights; and though the provision in "question has no doubt av arbitrary appearautą "that aspect of it will probably disappear altogether from unprejudiced minds when

fully considered. And at the meeting of the Legislative loueit on the 29th March 1889 when two of the Members Mr. Ryrie and W. Layton spoke on behalf of ourselves and other Marine for holders whose property would be affected, the form

the circumstances are

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.